![]() If so, little damage can be expected by allowing the hinge material to remain, and removal may be more hazardous to the object than the attachment itself. The attachment may be fairly inert (e.g., a Japanese paper hinge adhered with starch paste).This decision is made jointly between the conservator, who can estimate the time necessary for the removal, and the curator, who provides knowledge of the value and use of the collection.Įvaluating Condition of Artifact and Attachment To determine treatment priorities and the extent of treatment to be carried out, the amount of damage or potential for damage and the relative importance of object(s) in a collection must be considered. The decision to remove an opaque overlap to see what may be obscured below is a joint decision of the curator and the conservator and should be based on the likelihood of important information being discovered and the risk of damage to the object. These petitions are composed of multiple sheets which are lap joined by adhesive. Continuation sheets in roll petitions can cover information that is located at the top or bottom of the pages. Earlier notations in archival material can be obscured by later notations applied on an overlap or attachment. Information may be obscured by an attachment, such as revisions in prints and collages. Whether Attachment Obscures Information/Includes Important Information (LP) In such cases, it may be possible to treat the object by removing the most damaging portions of the attachment (e.g., the adhesive) and returning the remainder (e.g., the carrier) to an object. ![]() ![]() 1961) consider the degradation of pressure-sensitive tapes used in their composite photographs to be the natural evolution of the work. ![]() For example, the Starn twins (American, b.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |